Dude. If you were any more dense, you'd start collecting planets.

Gabe asked a question, "Do we believe Barr," which one would assume has to do with Barr saying Obama and Biden not being the subject of the investigation. To which I replied that I believe him. I think it would be a fool's errand to go after Obama and Biden without extensive evidence that they ordered a takedown on Trump. I want to wait to see where the evidence goes before casting accusations on the Obama Administration (including Biden). Even then, I don't think it would be a wise move go after them criminally, because the nation is divided right now. There's no way for it to appear like anything other than a hit.

Instead, I focused on the intelligence agencies, and listed "getting him fired" as my biggest concern to date. Something I deem punishable, regardless of anything else. When you punish agents who are WILLING to abuse their power, it could act as a deterrent to those who might consider doing so in the future. That is one of the roles of Justice, and it would make sense that this is the primary subject of Barr's investigation, possibly extending up to Clapper and Comey. I couldn't have said it any clearer. So, not only did I answer the question asked by Gabe, I gave it context.

You responded out of context. You're acting like I was using it to prove Obama orchestrated this hit on Trump.

---