(05-30-2020, 06:49 PM)MalabarJag Wrote:

(05-30-2020, 03:05 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: Twitter is not actively doing the fact checking. Of course they have to determine which tweets are not supported by facts, but they aren't telling users that the tweet is wrong, merely encouraging them to be informed on the topic. 
So - could they be biased in which tweets they single out? Yes, Time will tell. It's only just begun. 

Regarding the articles linked under Trump's tweet:  Did you read them? 
 There was quite a spectrum provided to choose from.  None of them can support the president's assertion of wide-spread mail-in fraud because there simply is no evidence to support it. The fact that they provide information that seems to at least somewhat contradict the president's assertion doesn't make them biased.  There just is no information to support him on the subject while info does exists that suggests he's being misleading.

First off, several different far-left sources are not "quite a spectrum."

Secondly, Trump never claimed that there has been widespread mail-in fraud. He claimed there would be. What Twitter did is equivalent to someone in 1961 implying Kennedy was wrong when he predicted a man on the moon before the end of the decade by linking a bunch of articles stating that man has never been on the moon.

Just answer me one question. 

If there is no evidence of consequential mail-in vote fraud despite MILLIONS upon MILLIONS of mail in votes being counted in past elections, why should anyone believe his claim that there suddenly will be?

Then if you're bold enough go read all of those linked articles and tell me which are far left and how many inaccuracies they contain.

---