(06-01-2020, 10:23 AM)Bullseye Wrote:

(05-31-2020, 06:37 PM)mikesez Wrote: Bullseye is only saying that Last42 does not get to pick who Bullseye should vote for or financially support, in terms of politicians or clergy.

If you met a Norwegian guy at the bar and started talking politics with him, would you take very kindly to him saying, "you guys should have voted for goldwater instead" or "you guys should have voted for Humphrey instead"? 
You wouldn't.
Because regardless of party affiliation, as a Norwegian, that is not his choice to make. Also, in all likelihood, you were not alive then, and in any case it was 50 years ago. So don't go spouting off about "Y'all would be better off if y'all had let Malcolm live."

Furthermore, while last 42's post tries, in some way for constructive dialogue, it's still largely silent on how African Americans are supposed to acceptably voice dissent.

  He talks about new leadership, rejecting gangs and the welfare state, but says nothing about voicing dissent against racism.