(06-03-2020, 04:11 PM)JagJohn Wrote:

(06-03-2020, 03:41 PM)jj82284 Wrote: Exactly.  

I would redraw everyone's attention to the variation amid the black community itself.  Black Carribeans, Blacks of west Indian descent have completely different profiles for interactions with police, education, learning, home ownership etc.  If the difference is purely employer discrimination or invidious standards THOSE disparities shouldn't exist.  

The best example raised by the left would be redlining, but even that example is flawed.  Your truth and lending statements technical term is a HUD-1.  why? Because that stands for department of housing and urban development.  Since 1976 with the community reinvestment act we have been monitoring the dat a loan terms etc. and with advent of the government sponsored entities, the government itself has been the major player in buying and packaging home loans.  Adjustable rate, floating rate, subprime, nonconforming etc. All manner of products were created marketed approved by the state and in most cases bought and repackaged by the state with the stated goal of CLOSING THE HOME OWNERSHIP GAP.  what were the RESULTS.  Complete and utter disaster.  Home buyers were hit with the freight train of run away housiniflation, then the firm's holding the paper were hit by the freight train of deflation and over supplyThe GSEs completely and totally misjudged the risk associated with "affordable housing" goals.  Systemic risk created in washington DC ran through the system the financial system nearly collapsed.  And when employment cratered who were the people hardest hit?  The same low income blacks they claim they wanted to help!  

How many times does progressivism have to fail?

So I would kindly ask jag john, to stand up and tell the class, where is the compassion and empathy in making sure that people who are bad off, become worse off.  

Liars figure. Figures dont lie.  The leading indicator for success is family structure.  This transcends not only race, but disparity within pre-tested high IQ individuals of similar background.  And ironically the black legitimacy rate, just like black crime rates, are 100% in the control of black americans.

Oh wise teacher, thank you for giving me the chance to contribute to this profound lesson you are teaching us all.

I'm in a [BLEEP] work zoom meeting right now that is thoroughly pissing me off, so please excuse me if I don't give a lengthy answer to your rambling nonsense.

To be absolutely honest, I find the argument that white privilege doesn't exist to be so entirely absurd that it is laughable. Again, most of the world sees this, it's only blowhards like you preaching to your choir of like-minded buffoons who actually bother to get into this again and again.

Did white privilege exist at some point in the past? If no, lol. If yes, when did it cease to exist exactly?

Can you explain what exactly "white privilege" is?  I mean other than a liberal fantasy.

Is/was it possible for a young black girl growing up in the era of the civil rights movement to succeed?

Is/was it possible for a poor young black man growing up in a ghetto in a single parent household to succeed?

Is/was it possible for a poor black man born in the 1940's and raised in the south to succeed?

What about a poor Hispanic (Mexican) male growing up through the 1920's and 1930's?  Could he not succeed without the so-called "white privilege"?  What about his off-spring?

Depending on what your definition of "white privilege" is, there is no way possible that any of these people ever had it.

---