(06-08-2020, 07:48 AM)jj82284 Wrote:

(06-08-2020, 02:50 AM)p_rushing Wrote: It was testimony, which hopefully was given at the scene or in interviews immediately afterwards. If it was after the media circus then you can't believe any of it. I doubt the prosecutor will offer a plea deal. There is no way they get a fair trial if they are innocent. They are already convicted and even if someone wants to find them not guilty, I don't see a way a juror would risk being exposed for voting not guilty.

I've been a juror with a bunch of liberals who didn't want to convict the guy of breaking in and attacking a woman with her 2 kids in the house because they were arguing and she stabbed him during the fight. He also went and took the younger kid to the bus stop because she had fled with her other kid who saw the fight. The DA overcharged kidnapping, the police didn't do much investigation, and she was a deadbeat who already wanted him back. All but 1 other woman said they didn't want to send him to jail for a bunch of years, not that he was not guilty.

This will be the opposite and they will be guilty no matter what the evidence says. As more evidence comes out it does look like they won't be able to use citizens arrest law, but even if they are able to it won't matter.

The governments case is gaining steam, but on the off chance that one juror wants to set the country ablaze, i just hope they find a way to plead out.  Because once you get away from the citizens arrest statute (that I don't really like in this situation anyway) I think that you could even run the risk of Murder 1 because of the amount of effort put into the chase while armed and potential hate crime if they show a history of racial animus.  This isn't purely a legal opinion, this is a please Gosh, your going to jail anyway don't give people a reason to burn our houses down, opinion.