Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Supreme Court protects LGBTQ+ workers from discrimination

#6
(This post was last modified: 06-15-2020, 08:50 PM by mikesez.)

(06-15-2020, 06:53 PM)EricC85 Wrote: Interesting how this might effect religious employment can a religious institution that still practices homosexuality as an act of sin forbid or Discriminate hiring homosexuals?

Can a church say you can’t be a gay preacher or teacher in their institutions?

No, Gorsuch specifically referred to the Religious Freedom Restoration Act as a "super statute" that must be upheld above any other statute.
Also, the law only applies to organizations above a certain number of employees, I think 15.  Most churches are below that number.

(06-15-2020, 06:56 PM)TJBender Wrote:
(06-15-2020, 06:53 PM)EricC85 Wrote: Interesting how this might effect religious employment can a religious institution that still practices homosexuality as an act of sin forbid or Discriminate hiring homosexuals?

Can a church say you can’t be a gay preacher or teacher in their institutions?

I haven't read the ruling and almost certainly never will, but on its face, no, they can't. I'd interpret this as meaning that if a transgendered individual gets hired into a position at a religious school without anyone figuring it out beforehand, there is zero ability to separate them from the business later on for that reason.

Religious schools in particular were given lots of leeway in some recent SCOTUS decisions.
Also, federal employment law really only becomes enforceable if there is a clear paper trail showing that the forbidden reason was an essential reason the employment decision was made.  If you needed to downsize, no liability.  If you can document that they failed in their job duties, worse than other employees that you kept, no liability.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Supreme Court protects LGBTQ+ workers from discrimination - by mikesez - 06-15-2020, 07:08 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!