(06-26-2020, 11:43 AM)Jamies_fried_chicken Wrote:

(06-26-2020, 11:10 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: The officers involved do not need to be fired or arrested and you have a really odd perspective on human nature. Being belligerent or rude adds to an already tense situation when the cops were clearly trying to figure out what was going on. Behaving in such a way makes you seem more suspicious to cops investigating a complaint. Maybe it's time for people to start a new education campaign with a new hashtag #complyandyouwon'tdie

And the UN is a terrible organization that has no business even being in existence much less overseeing American 

 
So by saying you don’t think the officer who slammed this person on the ground and injuring him  absolves him of discipline? He should keep his job while clearly Violating an innocent person’s civil rights? Im confused about having an odd perspective on human nature regarding holding someone accountable for doing something wrong. 


Police officers are supposed to be trained to de-escalate and remain calm while doing their jobs. Yes, they face stressful and dangerous situations. That’s what they get paid to do. If they can’t handle situations like what’s in this video above, they are not made for the job. 
The focus needs to be on the investigation and tactics part..again which is the civilian was compliant..handed over his id...him “acting suspicious” is voided the minute he hands over identification..the initial responding officer did not run it for warrants, nor had control of the situation. Then the second officer pulls up, gets walks to the man bear hugs, slam him to the ground , and break his wrist.

You said "Fired or arrested" and no, I don't agree with that. That is not the same as being "absolved of discipline." And you harping on the first officer really shows you are being disingenuous in this discussion, the cop was talking to the guy asking him questions that the guy clearly didn't want to answer as he became more hostile with each one and therefore continued to arouse suspicion. The cop isn't going to "go run it for warrants" and leave him standing there on the road so he can bolt when the guy is clearly not acting right.

---