(07-15-2020, 03:07 PM)TearExtractor Wrote: Reply from Uche

"If you understand anything about the politics going on right now, you would know the Jags are [BLEEP] with him because of the issues he has had openly with Khan's son. They are holding the man even after he has offered multiple scenarios that would see the jags either trade him with a franchise tag to another team. They are likely asking for a ridiculous return on him which they know other teams would not take all things considered with the environment of today that makes it hard to actually evaluate him physically now and adjust their market value accordingly. The same tactic they used to ship Ramsey off. No team is going to put themselves in that situation especially if they are squeezed for cap space in an uncertain season.

So yes, they are handling him like he is livestock, or they would pass him to another team for measly picks as they did with top tier DT Campbell and Upper mid tier DB Bouye. Fire sale for every core impact player except the guy who we don't really want and he doesn't want to play here anymore. I have seen it before with teammate of mine by the name of Maurice Jones-Drew. They didn't want to pay him while in his prime against a contract he had outplayed for 3 years(3 pro bowls) and they just cold shouldered him to the point he was close to asking to be traded."

I don't understand that mindset. Campbell is 33 years old and is nearing the end of his career. Ngakoue is 25 and is quite literally in his prime. The Jags are right to be expecting more value than they got for Campbell. And the Jags did Campbell a favor by trading him to a contender because of how awesome of a player and teammate he's been to the team.

Personally, I feel like the franchise tag should be abolished. It gets rid of these "holding them hostage" arguments that people tend to have.

---