Quote:BAP is the only way your team will ever reach competitive strength.

 

It keeps each unit on the roster full. It provide your coaching staff the most talented players possible.

 

BAP isn't insane, only the outrageous scenarios contrived to counter-argue BAP are.

 

Needs drafting doesn't work. Look at us.

 

Taking a less talented player to fill a need over a more talented football player at another position is awful.

 

Then address the point in the article about the 6-2, 330 lb nose tackle.

 

The Bears reached the conference championship not too long ago by excluding from their board NTs with those dimensions, even though they could have been better players overall than the DTs they DID have on their board.

 

Is a "Best available player" who doesn't fit your scheme at all truly a "Best available player"

 when they will be less effective in your scheme?

 

Is a BAP who IS a PERFECT scheme fit for you but actually inferior to a player who doesn't fit your scheme truly a BAP?

---