Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Another jump to conclusions without all the facts...


(08-25-2020, 07:04 PM)jagibelieve Wrote:
(08-25-2020, 06:35 PM)mikesez Wrote: (1) The two officers failed to hold him down. More officers were available and more should have joined.
(2) he's not causal at all.  He's obviously agitated.
(3) no way for them to know at the time, from what we know now.
(4) stand up, run after him, unless I've seen him with a knife.
(5) I just fought him hand to hand, so, most likely, I've either already seen his weapon (if the knife story was true) or I'm pretty sure he has no weapon.

But at this point the perspective shifts.  First questions were from the perspective of the two officers fighting on the ground.  The next questions are from the perspective of the officer who fired the shot.
(6) presumably, I drew my weapon to give cover to the two officers fighting on the ground. I had a decent position, about 15 feet away from the fight. At this point I have two responsibilities. One is to fire my weapon, if I perceive an immediate threat to anyone's life. But the other is to make sure I and only I maintain control of this loaded, unholstered, and unlocked weapon. I can't risk hand to hand combat anymore.  A suspect in his right mind will act the same with a pistol pointed at him from 15 feet away, as he acts when a pistol is up against his skull. Tactically, I gain nothing, and lose everything, if I close distance with him with my weapon still drawn.
(7) this is a tactical error stemming from either a lack of coordination or lack of training, or bad training.  There was no need for a second person to draw a gun. It should have been 3 with fists, tazers, and batons, and one with a gun.  It's very off-putting when we see the man get up and just walk past two officers who are holding weapons. Our instinct is to think that the one who stood his ground was lazy.  But that was the one who had good training, and knows that he cannot close with a weapon drawn. But the other officer thinks he can close with his weapon drawn, and you see what happens.

Mikesez and his "tactical knowledge"... the gift that keeps on giving.   Laughing Laughing

Prove you have more knowledge than me.
Prove you can answer the seven questions better than I did.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 08-24-2020, 10:03 AM
RE: Another jump to conclusions without all the facts... - by mikesez - 08-25-2020, 07:13 PM
Copycat - by copycat - 08-29-2020, 10:50 PM



Users browsing this thread:

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!