Quote:I'm confused CW. Your reasoning for Luck being great is "wins". Russell Wilson beats him in this department and puts up superior passing numbers with worse wideouts and Luck is superior to him?

 

Uh, no.

 

Luck is great because of his wins, moments in critical situations, and his ability to do more with less talent around him. Oh and Luck 2,000 more passing yards than Wilson in his career (Wilson has the ability to rely on his running game/defense A LOT more than Luck)

 

The talent around Wilson compared to Luck is night and day. Not even close. 

 

PS: I REALLY like Russell Wilson, he's just not Luck. RG3 is not even in the conversation (I had RG3 as the 4th best rookie his rookie year, and was proven right the following year).

 

PSS: I REALLY don't want to derail another thread talking about something that neither of us will agree on, if you want to continue this circle of talk go ahead and post it in the other thread that's 20+ pages long. Probably won't reply to anything else on this thread not regarding the Chud hire.

---