(08-30-2020, 09:11 AM)mikesez Wrote:

(08-30-2020, 12:02 AM)MojoKing Wrote: Then respectfully I ask, what evidence do you have that Trump, did not conspire with them? 
And great If you are saying they interfered, doesn’t it concern you at all that they, Russia our enemy, Putin the guy that kills journalists and poisons the opposition party, wants Trump to be our president?

I don't agree with that line of questioning. You cannot demand evidence to prove a negative. That's not just a rule of jurisprudence.  Logic demands it.
2016 was the 5th US presidential election we had with Putin in charge of Russia.  He didn't express an opinion about the first four.  He chose to express an opinion in 2016. Westerners who have dealt with Putin consistently say that he believes in bizarre conspiracy theories, some of them of his own invention. He may have had a logical reason for coming down in favor of Trump, but he's done lots of other things in the past with no discernible logical reason.  Now, there is reason to be suspicious, that Trump colluded, or offered Putin something in exchange for the support, but you can only be suspicious. You have to find evidence to prove it, before you can expect other people to believe it.