Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2

#8

Quote:I honestly think the Rams will try and trade out of that pick. Bradford is legit, he just hasn't been healthy long enough to show it. I don't think they will draft a QB. If they don't trade out, I could see a selection like Watkins if they don't go Matthews. I think the philosophy of not drafting Olinemen high might be legitimate. Even though the most dominant tackles usually come way up high, you can still get decent out of lower picks, and there certainly are players who can make much more of a difference that high in the draft.
 

Despite the article, i still think the Rams will either take a LT there at 2 or trade out as you indicate there.  As a general rule, I can support taking a LT high, but aside from that, I think OL can be found later.

 

There are reasons for the Rams to stick with Bradford and it would not be a shock at all to see them go that route.  I think Watkins at 2 is a longshot for the Rams, but I think if they take him, they will be difficult to defend.

 

Worst to 1st.  Curse Reversed!





Reply


Messages In This Thread
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-13-2014, 07:58 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Predator - 02-13-2014, 08:48 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-13-2014, 09:00 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by rfc17 - 02-13-2014, 10:29 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by wiseman101 - 02-13-2014, 10:42 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-13-2014, 11:24 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Deacon - 02-13-2014, 11:26 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-13-2014, 11:27 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-13-2014, 11:30 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-13-2014, 11:34 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Vino - 02-13-2014, 11:36 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Deacon - 02-13-2014, 11:44 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-13-2014, 11:51 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by ukjag34 - 02-13-2014, 11:51 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Predator - 02-13-2014, 12:13 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-13-2014, 12:17 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Deacon - 02-13-2014, 12:17 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-13-2014, 12:25 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-13-2014, 12:56 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by HiggyJ15 - 02-13-2014, 01:30 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Raven09s - 02-13-2014, 01:31 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by TJBender - 02-13-2014, 03:43 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Jungle Cat - 02-14-2014, 06:28 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Kodiak - 02-14-2014, 08:18 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Jungle Cat - 02-15-2014, 02:01 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by ukjag34 - 02-15-2014, 01:10 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Scarecrow - 02-15-2014, 01:32 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-15-2014, 02:48 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-15-2014, 02:52 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-15-2014, 03:03 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-15-2014, 03:06 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-15-2014, 05:16 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by NYC4jags - 02-15-2014, 05:29 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by TJBender - 02-16-2014, 08:16 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bon Jagley - 02-16-2014, 10:31 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Scarecrow - 02-16-2014, 02:53 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Cleatwood - 02-16-2014, 02:59 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Cleatwood - 02-16-2014, 05:22 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Cleatwood - 02-16-2014, 05:32 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by jjud1017 - 02-16-2014, 05:56 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by TJBender - 02-17-2014, 12:46 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Jungle Cat - 02-18-2014, 01:15 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Jungle Cat - 02-18-2014, 01:47 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Cleatwood - 02-18-2014, 01:23 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-18-2014, 03:03 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by TJBender - 02-18-2014, 10:56 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-25-2014, 02:58 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-25-2014, 03:56 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by pirkster - 02-25-2014, 04:53 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-25-2014, 05:19 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-25-2014, 05:25 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by KFL - 02-25-2014, 05:49 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Deacon - 02-25-2014, 06:05 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-25-2014, 07:15 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Deacon - 02-26-2014, 10:09 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-26-2014, 10:47 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Deacon - 02-26-2014, 11:42 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-26-2014, 12:00 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Deacon - 02-26-2014, 12:32 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!