Quote:Actually it is. Through the use of the contra-positive of what he said "I didn't take a non-punter because I didn't want someone that wasn't needed as a starter" it becomes logically clear. He didn't declare he was a needs drafter, but transitively he said he was a needs drafter by saying he drafted a guy out of need rather than graded ability.

Now you are quoting him for things he didn't even say.

 

You are creating the connection between what he said and the concept of need by paraphrasing what he is saying to suit your purpose. You are basically creating fiction to back your point. That's conjecture and that isn't considered evidence under any legal or scientific circumstance.

---