(09-19-2020, 01:31 PM)EricC85 Wrote:

(09-19-2020, 12:02 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: So I have a question for you....

Did you feel RBG was going to make it another 4 years? This was an important issue the whole time, but in the forefront sooner than expected. 

If a conservative SCOTUS is important to you, Trump should have been your vote all along, no?

I wasn’t ready to commit to Trump for a 2nd term on the likeliness we will need another judge appointed however under the reality that we are 100% facing a judge appointment I have no choice

(09-19-2020, 01:02 AM)MojoKing Wrote: Look you guys this wouldnt of been an issue had the Reps just accepted Garland (which would’ve been really in your favor since he was a moderate)

Regardless of what you say, Dems would have NEVER reestablished constitutional law when it came to the SC.
Republicans (McConell really) made this whole situation a giant constitutional mess.

To have a hearing 45 days before the election and during a pandemic no less, is just such blatant hypocrisy.

In fact I think this is a perfect moment to balance what happened.
You guys get 1 and we get 1 based on the new precedent established.

Then we establish into law.
* During election year, SC justice may not be appointed by sitting president.