(09-23-2020, 07:53 AM)Jagwired Wrote:

(09-23-2020, 07:25 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: But paying off the fines is not impacting whether they vote.  It's impacting whether they are eligible to vote.  There's no quid pro quo.  They don't have to vote to get their fines paid off.

Buuuwhaaahaaa!!   Real solid plan there, remove another deterrence to crime from these criminals in a weak [BLEEP] plan to buy votes. Pathetic.

Yeah, I'm sure they will be told "Hey, you're welcome about those fines and make sure that you vote your conscience whether that be Trump or creepy joe.

You seriously think that the prospect of not being eligible to vote would actually deter someone from committing a crime?  Buuuwhaaaahaaa right back at ya!

---

(09-23-2020, 07:29 AM)TrivialPursuit Wrote:

(09-23-2020, 07:25 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: But paying off the fines is not impacting whether they vote.  It's impacting whether they are eligible to vote.  There's no quid pro quo.  They don't have to vote to get their fines paid off.

It's a despicable thing to do regardless of its legality.

I can't believe anyone would support a party that openly admits it wants the lowest of the low to vote for them. The Party of Pandering.

Florida voters voted to allow convicted felons to vote, by a 2/3 majority.   It was DeSantis who imposed the obligation to pay off all their fines first.   Since a 2/3 majority of Florida voters want convicted felons to be able to vote, I doubt the optics of this would be hurtful to Biden.

---