The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Dems want term limits for SCOTUS
|
(09-26-2020, 11:01 AM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote:(09-26-2020, 09:13 AM)JagNGeorgia Wrote: If it’s easy to change the constitution, then it becomes a worthless document. What point does it serve if it can just be changed so easily and changed so significantly? Maybe or maybe not. If there’s something so important to require an amendment, then it should be easy to get enough support to amend it. If the support doesn’t exist, then it shouldn’t be so easily changed. Support for random causes fluctuates all the time. What may be supported today may not be supported tomorrow, and if it’s an easy process to change it, you could find yourself on the wrong end of that change. |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.