(10-10-2020, 09:22 PM)NeptuneBeachBum Wrote:

(10-10-2020, 09:18 PM)Bullseye Wrote: If not ranked in any real order...I would put Chark above Fuller.  Fuller has speed to burn, but he can't stay healthy.

I'd consider putting him above Fitzgerald and Green.  Fitz and Green have been great, and there would be zero question if we were talking about them in their primes.  But I'd say right now, Chark is more explosive than either of those guys.  But Fitz could easily be "Professor receiver.  In comparison to his knowledge of the position, Fitz could be a "professor."
."
I've never been a huge fan of Robert Woods  Chark has better deep speed than Landry, though I would say Landry runs better routes.

So that is like 5 guys on this list you have him ahead of... that would put him at #30.  I have him a little higher than you at about #23.

I'm not necessarily ranking him specifically at 30, just pointing out guys I would take Chark over.  After further consideration, I think I would include him over TY Hilton.  Hilton was amazing earlier in his career when he had Luck throwing him the ball.  He was fast and quick...almost impossible to jam.  But we've managed to do a good job on him over the past few years.  In comparison, I think Chark can give you deep speed and more physicality than Hilton.

I agree with you he wouldn't be a top 10 WR right now no matter how you slice it.  But I am happy with his development at receiver so far.

---

(10-10-2020, 09:20 PM)jaguarmvp Wrote: First Quarter award for best home packed Lunch:

Dough Marrone

Bologna on Rye with Sour Cream and onion chips.

Eh...Rye?  Sour Cream and Onion?

Not sure about that.  Questionable choices.  

---