(10-12-2020, 01:43 PM)Predator Wrote:

(10-12-2020, 01:12 PM)NeptuneBeachBum Wrote: Yes.  And giving up 416 yards per game on defense ranks us 29th in the League... but better than one of our division leaders (Tennessee) and ahead of the 5-0 Seahawks.  So that must be good too, right?  Such reductionist and clueless logic... you are hilarious.

I am all for running the ball... if it is working.  Like I said, if you think 3.7 or 3.8 YPC is good, it just shows how uneducated you are.  Any simpleton understands that is poor and ranks in the bottom 5 in the League.  But I will keep on schooling you if you'd like.

We were only down 6 points late in the 3rd qtr with a 3rd and 2 on Houston's 9 when the incompetent Gruden decided to abandon the "terrible" 3.8 avg  run game  and throw the ball twice. On 4th and 1 he has are RB with a "terrible" 3.7 avg try a pass play which resulted in a TO and momentum swing. If you don't understand how stupid that was or how horrible of a game plan to call 55 pass plays against the leagues worst rush defense, then you make a simpleton look like Einstein.

In that one particular instance, we are in agreement.  Terrible play calling there.  So that would get us one or two more rushes in the game.  Happy then?  Houston was also overloading the run at that point anyway, so we may not have gotten it regardless. Your lack of understanding of situational football is quite apparent.

But it doesn't change how poor your simplistic arguments are of thinking a 3.7 YPC average is anything but bad because its better than the undefeated Bills.  That is just plain stupid logic.  Just like saying 417 yards per game allowed isn't bad because its better than the Titans and Seahawks.  lmao

---