(10-29-2020, 10:10 AM)mikesez Wrote: You have two problems. You are misunderstanding a lot of what I say, and you're making a lot of incorrect assertions. Each time I try to correct you, you continue to misunderstand me. DVOA uses 25+ years of actual games to create their baseline.  Creating a baseline like that is extremely tedious, but it's not hard to gain access to the data behind it, and the baseline is stable across teams and across years.  QBR seems to use real time simulation of the result of the current game as its baseline.  That's much more volatile and harder to explain.

TL;DR - just let people disagree with you, dude.

I have no problem with people disagreeing with me, if its a logical argument.  You keep making false and irrational statements.  Then you complain when I am using your own words and logic against you.  QBR and DVOA are essentially the same; they look at all the same contextual variables to evaluate QB play.  They just calculate them slightly differently.  Its clear you do not comprehend this and you have no idea how either stat is calculated.

But I will accept your plea for submission from this discussion, and let you tap out.  Peace.

---