(11-02-2020, 07:00 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote:

(11-02-2020, 06:45 PM)NeptuneBeachBum Wrote: I don't think the order matters.  Indianapolis is an example that went and got Manning as QB, then built the team around him.  But we currently have neither the team, nor the QB.  That is quite clear.

I like BPA, but I wouldnt start a QB week 1 just because se drafted him with the 2nd pick.   I dont like starting rookie QBs week 1 unless your team is already built and he's ready.  A huge risk imo what Cincinnati has done with Burrow

I wouldn't disagree with that.  But if BPA is close between a QB and an O-Lineman... I'm taking the QB.  If Trevor Lawrence turns out to be the next Mahomes and Sewell turns out to be the next Joe Thomas... who would you rather have?  There are examples each way you can point to whether you should sit or start your rookie QB in Week 1.  I don't feel strongly about either way you do it... I just know you need to get a great QB at some point to really be successful.

---