Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Short dual threat vs. tall pocket passer

#9

They often say that running QBs will actually take more sacks than many of the immobile QBs. Although I guess where a running QB will attempt to scramble but then get taken down for a sack, an immobile QB will end up just throwing the ball away.  So do you want a guy who takes the yardage loss or just deflates his completion percentage?  And whatever benefit you get from the scrambler who is able to make a play, does that outweigh the negative's from the extra sacks?




________________________________________________
Scouting well is all that matters.  Draft philosophy is all fluff.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Short dual threat vs. tall pocket passer - by rfc17 - 02-18-2014, 12:03 PM
Short dual threat vs. tall pocket passer - by KFL - 02-18-2014, 03:14 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!