(11-21-2020, 03:45 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote:

(11-21-2020, 01:20 PM)mikesez Wrote: You can bring a horse to facts, but you can't make her understand.
You're smarter than this.
Some part of your personality is telling you to not engage with it, though.
The allegation that Trump colluded with Russia amounted to a campaign finance violation.  Even if proven, it could not have changed the result of the 2016 election.  Even if proven, it would still have been up to the House to impeach and the Senate to convict.
This is basic civics.  I know you took it.
Trump today is trying to allege that he won more votes in PA, AZ, and other states.  Very, very different from anything any other candidate for President has ever done since 1876

More ad hominem attacks from you...how original. 

Your argument was about election integrity, not if the president was or will be replaced. Repeated claims of colluding with a foreign government to steal an election impacted the integrity of that election, no matter what the end result turned out to be.