(11-21-2020, 03:58 PM)p_rushing Wrote:

(11-21-2020, 03:17 PM)NeptuneBeachBum Wrote: QAnon logic... very strong argument!

Honestly I have no clue where to go to get q info or even who their members are.

This cheating didn't start this year. Trump knew it was happening and set up the EO. You can hide your eyes all you want, but it is being exposed.

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk

SHEEP (dfn) - a person who blindly follows an ideology or a belief that is based in faith of the preacher, rather than the content of the message

My eyes are wide open... where is your proof, Little Bo Peep?  Do you have access to Rudy's "evidence" that he's not letting anyone else see?  Including the judges in court where Trump-supported election legal cases currently have a record of 1-31?  Please open my eyes with all of your proof.

---

(11-21-2020, 03:45 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote:

(11-21-2020, 01:20 PM)mikesez Wrote: You can bring a horse to facts, but you can't make her understand.
You're smarter than this.
Some part of your personality is telling you to not engage with it, though.
The allegation that Trump colluded with Russia amounted to a campaign finance violation.  Even if proven, it could not have changed the result of the 2016 election.  Even if proven, it would still have been up to the House to impeach and the Senate to convict.
This is basic civics.  I know you took it.
Trump today is trying to allege that he won more votes in PA, AZ, and other states.  Very, very different from anything any other candidate for President has ever done since 1876

More ad hominem attacks from you...how original. 

Your argument was about election integrity, not if the president was or will be replaced. Repeated claims of colluding with a foreign government to steal an election impacted the integrity of that election, no matter what the end result turned out to be.

Not seeing any ad hominem attack there... sorry Mod.

There are different degrees of election integrity.  There is a significant difference between claims that a campaign colluded with a foreign entity to illegally influence voters versus claims that the actual voting process was fraudulent and intentionally changed the will of the people.  You have to be able to see the difference. One is claiming unethical and illegal behavior in changing the hearts and minds of the electorate; the other is intentionally tearing down the fabric of the democratic process... with no proof.

---