(11-22-2020, 11:47 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote:

(11-22-2020, 11:42 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: There's not a court in the land that wants to get involved with this. The USSC, nor any other court, will touch it.

As FSG pointed out in another thread, I don't think Trump concedes until he's brought enough attention to these irregularities. It also makes good campaign fodder down the road for Republicans.

When all the states declare and the GSA makes its proclamation, Trump will step aside.

Does it really matter what they want? At the end of the day, Americans need to trust the integrity of our election system. It's essentially the backbone of our entire democracy.  

IMO, there is a huge amount of effort being put forth by the Trump legal team for the sole intention of bringing attention to the issue.

It entirely matters what they want because they do not want to get involved unless overwhelming evidence is presented to hear a case. So far none has. Had the courts been wanting to get involved based on the scantest of evidence, that would be more alarming than election fraud. 

Judges are keenly aware that courts becoming involved in the domain of voter decision is a dangerous place.

---