(11-22-2020, 12:25 PM)mikesez Wrote:

(11-22-2020, 11:56 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: It entirely matters what they want because they do not want to get involved unless overwhelming evidence is presented to hear a case. So far none has. Had the courts been wanting to get involved based on the scantest of evidence, that would be more alarming than election fraud. 

Judges are keenly aware that courts becoming involved in the domain of voter decision is a dangerous place.

Just like getting to January 20th with two men claiming the right to take the oath of office would be a dangerous place, and is very much to be avoided.