(11-28-2020, 12:14 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: I don't think the SC will take it. The most legitimate claims right now don't involve fraud, but the constitutionality of the executive branches of government overriding the state legislatures. I just don't think people have the balls to overturn an election on those grounds, even though I think it's a perfectly valid complaint. This is why I don't put a lot of stock in failed court hearings. They are probing for their most credible claim. I don't think it will be enough. That said, none of this relieves my doubts that there was widespread voter fraud in this election in swing states. I just don't buy the specific turnouts, with the exception of GA (possibly).

Its not about having the "balls"; people have the "brains" not to overturn an election based on embarrassingly weak and unsubstantiated claims of fraud.  The judges are literally laughing at these claims, not just dismissing them.  You can believe whatever you want.  Like I said, you present yourself as an intelligent person in many regards; but your logic and "intellectual honesty" are clearly blinded by your bias in this case.

---