I am not talking about claims of fraud. I am saying that it's pretty clear that the executive branches of the state governments in MI, PA, and GA took liberties that violated the election rules written by the legislative branch of the same governments. Constitutionally, that should be overturned, which should invalidate votes caused by those policies. It has nothing to do with fraud except those actions taken by the Secretaries of State potentially undermined election integrity. That is the best argument Giuliani has, but I think it'd take tremendous balls by a judge to do that. At that point, the burden would be on democrats to prove why those votes are legitimate.

---