(11-28-2020, 12:42 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: I am not talking about claims of fraud. I am saying that it's pretty clear that the executive branches of the state governments in MI, PA, and GA took liberties that violated the election rules written by the legislative branch of the same governments. Constitutionally, that should be overturned, which should invalidate votes caused by those policies. It has nothing to do with fraud except those actions taken by the Secretaries of State potentially undermined election integrity. That is the best argument Giuliani has, but I think it'd take tremendous balls by a judge to do that. At that point, the burden would be on democrats to prove why those votes are legitimate.

The courts did not find any violations of election rules before the vote; and the rules remained consistent with what was agreed upon before the election in each state.  The Supreme Court did not intervene with individual states rights to conduct their election procedures as they saw fit (other than identifying a small number of ballots in PA that arrived after Nov. 3rd).  That is not fraud and not undermining election integrity. Attempting to change the rules AFTER the election and discarding legitimate votes would be criminal and violate the will of the people.  Are you an advocate of eliminating individual states' rights for how they decide their election procedures, and instead having a uniform set of protocols for federal elections?  That kind of left-wing approach sounds pretty ironic coming from you.

---