I see what you're saying, but I don't agree completely. I would even go to say that with Garrard, you "knew what you had" and besides getting that big contract, with his age, where he was picked, and his average at best play we were bound to have to draft a replacement anyway. With Gabbert it wasn't right away that "we knew what had". We had to go through some growing pains and horrendous play minus the growth. This is his fourth year and some may even argue that we still do not know. Think of the QB's that have been passed up in recent drafts because we picked Gabbert a year or two earlier... Maybe they're both as bad at the same level, but in different ways.

---