The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
2020 Presidental Election
|
(12-14-2020, 10:59 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: It's the lack of evidentiary hearings that bothers me, but that really falls on the states more than the courts. I knew Trump was going to have an uphill battle. I knew that courts were going to be reluctant to accept these cases, and I have said that here multiple times. I had a strong feeling the Supreme Court would reject this case. However, considering the nature of this election, the anomalies that took place, and the fact that we are using more of the least secure method of voting (absentee ballots), I expected more states to thoroughly audit the ballots. Where states were unwilling to do this, I had hoped the courts would consider it. This, at the very least, reduces some of the mistrust in our current system. Transparency is important. I think what a lot of Trump supporters might be missing is that what Trump attorneys say outside of court and what they say in court are two different things. They make a lot of allegations, but when they actually get to court, they are much more guarded in terms of what they allege. Outside of court, they scream about voter fraud. In court, when they are questioned by judges, they have been forced to admit they aren't alleging voter fraud because they don't have evidence of it. This is why there haven't been evidentiary hearings. A judge says, "You're making this charge, what evidence would you present?" And time after time after hearing the answer to that question, the judge has said, "You don't have enough evidence to bring a case." Donald Trump And His Lawyers Are Making Sweeping Allegations of Voter Fraud In Public. In Court, They Say No Such Thing |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.