(12-31-2020, 11:43 AM)p_rushing Wrote:

(12-30-2020, 04:57 PM)The Real Marty Wrote: The machines produce a paper ballot which is then retained for possible later hand recount.   They did a hand recount, and that proved that the machines were not changing votes.  The hand recount matched the machine count.  So it's been proven that the machines did not change any votes.  

And now, they've just completed a signature audit, and it found no discrepancies.  The signatures on the envelopes all match the signatures in the voters' files. 

So why are they going on and on about this?

They never did a full paper hand count of all votes. There is also a qr code that cannot be read by a human that is used to read the paper ballot. The words on the paper mean nothing.

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk