(02-27-2021, 01:56 AM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote:

(02-26-2021, 06:35 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: Lol, I gave you specific stats that disprove your position; you just don't wanna accept that you're being unreasonable because your emotions got in the way of your brains. Not unusual, that red you're seeing messes with the bulls too.

You gave stats regarding confessions and other nonsense that have nothing to do with what I said. You're just being vague, because you can't find any actual cases which back up your argument. This entire argument is pointless, because you aren't following the guidelines I gave which I believe should eliminate certain appeals. I should have expected this from you though, as you always fail to provide details for your political arguments. Just generalizations.

Those stats have EVERYTHING to do with your ridiculous position. Every one of those cases at the Innocence Project source provided were "undeniably" guilty of capital crimes as adjudicated by a jury of their peers. And every one of those verdicts was wrong. This isn't vague, it's clear and obvious. You've taken this stance on your "guidelines" as if it matters. It doesn't. Misidentification. Exculpatory DNA evidence. Even outright FALSE CONFESSION, what you would consider the penultimate case of "Undeniable Guilt", has been PROVEN in a court of law to be, in fact, deniable. I've provided you written documentation of capital cases overturned on appeal and all you can do is try to gin up some hypothetical situation where the defendant shouldn't be entitled to a fair trial. No, you're wrong, every defendant is entitled to the presumption of innocence, a fair trial, and access to the appeals process of the United States legal system in every single case that comes before the court, even if he or she did it.

---