(03-22-2021, 04:40 PM)RicoTx Wrote:

(03-22-2021, 04:26 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: What difference does it make????? I used Mahomes as the example of an established QB. The QB's in this scenario are interchangeable. I could've used Matthew Stafford, Joe Burrow, Josh Allen, Ben Roethlisberger, Baker Mayfield, Lamar Jackson, Ryan Tannehill, Derek Carr, Justin Herbert, Daks Prescott, Aaron Rodgers, Kirk Cousins, Matt Ryan, Tom Brady or Russell Wilson. Any established QB would've worked in this scenario. Mahomes was just the first one that popped into my mind. The point being that when you have a position with established starters already established for the foreseeable future, you don't spend first round picks on that position, because you're just drafting for depth. When you are 1-15, you spend high picks to add potential good starters, not backups.

For the record, this is an example of spoon feeding you concepts you should already know. The names used in scenarios are generic, it's the big picture that you are completely missing.

Spoon feeding me.  LOL.  You choose possibly the best current QB in the game and then says it's the same as the rest.  And guess what, quarterback is waaaaaay different no matter who it is.  If you don't know that, you aren't as smart as you pretend to be.

Again, you are focusing on the wrong thing. If you need it simplified, which apparently you do, we'll use a different position. I'll try to go slowly for you. This time we'll use OT. Take the Saints for example. They have Terron Armstead and Ryan Ramczyk. Just pretend like their current contracts extended into 2024. In that case, you wouldn't draft an OT in round 1, because you have established starters there for the foreseeable future. The same goes for our DE/DT position. Get it now? I can't water this down any further for you

---