Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Oakland CA giving out monthly checks to low income families...unless you’re white.

#31

(03-28-2021, 01:55 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(03-28-2021, 12:35 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: I would love for you to explain the nonsense you wrote there. Would you be so kind? How does removing the voting privilege of a person while he is on the public dole equate to some blather about gun owners?

I thought it was pretty clear.
he's saying if your voting right is tied to your economic status, so should your right to own guns.

(03-28-2021, 01:22 PM)jj82284 Wrote: The last 50 years called....

the welfare payments the last 50 years have been means tested, which has been demonstrated to promote divorce and fatherlessness. A mother might be better off divorcing her husband and collecting welfare than she is staying with him and enjoying the benefits of his wages.

The new benefit they just rolled out is basically universal, all parents get it, except for the very wealthiest parents.

You do realize that there is no Constitutional right to vote that can't be rescinded for exactly the reason I gave, right? The right to be included in the decision making of this nation should not be given to wards of the state. So long as they are on the dole they need to be off the roll, else they risk a moral hazard in their voting.

(03-28-2021, 02:20 PM)Jamies_fried_chicken Wrote:
(03-28-2021, 12:35 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: I would love for you to explain the nonsense you wrote there. Would you be so kind? How does removing the voting privilege of a person while he is on the public dole equate to some blather about gun owners?

I was surmising your response to an analogy but will be glad to explain.

Your previous responses from what I interpreted was if a voter was was poor life choices, they shouldnt be allowed to vote. Ie if someone is on welfare, homeless, financially broke then they shouldnt be allowed to vote. I then used what I interpreted from your responses and used it as an analogy to a prospective gun owner. My whole point was to say a person’s lifestyle or life choices has no relevance to their constitution rights.

(03-28-2021, 01:22 PM)jj82284 Wrote: The last 50 years called....


Liar.

So Georgia didnt pass new voting laws?

(03-28-2021, 01:55 PM)mikesez Wrote: I thought it was pretty clear.
he's saying if your voting right is tied to your economic status, so should your right to own guns.


Yeah I thought I was clear in my response as well.

Right, you made an analogy that made no sense. I understand.
“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Reply


Messages In This Thread
Jamies_fried_chicken - by Jamies_fried_chicken - 03-28-2021, 07:16 AM
RE: Jamies_fried_chicken - by flsprtsgod - 03-28-2021, 07:39 AM
RE: Jamies_fried_chicken - by The Real Marty - 03-28-2021, 07:54 AM
RE: Jamies_fried_chicken - by flsprtsgod - 03-28-2021, 07:57 AM
RE: Jamies_fried_chicken - by flsprtsgod - 03-28-2021, 12:35 PM
RE: Jamies_fried_chicken - by mikesez - 03-28-2021, 01:55 PM
RE: Jamies_fried_chicken - by jj82284 - 03-28-2021, 08:34 PM
Jamies_fried_chicken - by Jamies_fried_chicken - 03-28-2021, 08:40 PM
RE: Jamies_fried_chicken - by flsprtsgod - 03-28-2021, 09:14 PM
RE: Jamies_fried_chicken - by homebiscuit - 03-28-2021, 09:21 PM
RE: Jamies_fried_chicken - by flsprtsgod - 03-28-2021, 10:48 PM
RE: Jamies_fried_chicken - by MarleyJag - 03-29-2021, 06:41 AM
RE: Jamies_fried_chicken - by flsprtsgod - 03-29-2021, 08:24 AM
RE: Jamies_fried_chicken - by MarleyJag - 03-29-2021, 09:07 AM
RE: Jamies_fried_chicken - by flsprtsgod - 03-29-2021, 04:15 PM
RE: Jamies_fried_chicken - by flsprtsgod - 03-29-2021, 08:18 AM
RE: Jamies_fried_chicken - by flsprtsgod - 03-28-2021, 05:49 PM
RE: Jamies_fried_chicken - by mikesez - 03-28-2021, 06:57 PM
Jamies_fried_chicken - by Jamies_fried_chicken - 03-28-2021, 07:30 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!