Login

Jamies_fried_chicken · 03-28-2021, 07:30 PM

(03-28-2021, 05:49 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote:
(03-28-2021, 01:55 PM)mikesez Wrote: I thought it was pretty clear.
he's saying if your voting right is tied to your economic status, so should your right to own guns.

the welfare payments the last 50 years have been means tested, which has been demonstrated to promote divorce and fatherlessness. A mother might be better off divorcing her husband and collecting welfare than she is staying with him and enjoying the benefits of his wages.

The new benefit they just rolled out is basically universal, all parents get it, except for the very wealthiest parents.

You do realize that there is no Constitutional right to vote that can't be rescinded for exactly the reason I gave, right? The right to be included in the decision making of this nation should not be given to wards of the state. So long as they are on the dole they need to be off the roll, else they risk a moral hazard in their voting.

(03-28-2021, 02:20 PM)Jamies_fried_chicken Wrote: I was surmising your response to an analogy but will be glad to explain.

Your previous responses from what I interpreted was if a voter was was poor life choices, they shouldnt be allowed to vote. Ie if someone is on welfare, homeless, financially broke then they shouldnt be allowed to vote. I then used what I interpreted from your responses and used it as an analogy to a prospective gun owner. My whole point was to say a person’s lifestyle or life choices has no relevance to their constitution rights.

So Georgia didnt pass new voting laws?

Yeah I thought I was clear in my response as well.

Right, you made an analogy that made no sense. I understand.

To you my opinion dosent make sense which is okay, but your opinion is not rooted in facts. It moreso comes across as illogical, unrealistic and unreasonable.

(03-28-2021, 06:57 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(03-28-2021, 05:49 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: You do realize that there is no Constitutional right to vote that can't be rescinded for exactly the reason I gave, right? The right to be included in the decision making of this nation should not be given to wards of the state. So long as they are on the dole they need to be off the roll, else they risk a moral hazard in their voting.

The 15th amendment says that you only lose your right to vote on account of a felony conviction.

Doesn't say anything about economic status or welfare programs.

I was literally about to say the same thing until I saw your post.

Whether someone has a liberal, or conservative viewpoint, a authoritative figure should not lock a thread for the sole purpose to get the last word in all the while prohibiting someone else from being able to respond.