(05-01-2021, 11:32 AM)Bullseye Wrote:

(05-01-2021, 11:28 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: Nothing to do with Etienne and everything to do with value.

To clarify, do you not think he represented value because you believe RBs should not be taken in the first, or do you not think Etienne was not worth a first round pick?  If you are saying it has nothing to do with Etienne, then I surmise it isn't the latter.

Or was Etienne less valuable to the Jaguars because he was not as much of a need as someone at another position?

Just my 2 cents. For the role I believe he will play, I don't see much of a difference between what Etienne will bring to the team and what guys like Michael Carter, Kenneth Gainwell, Trey Sermon, Chuba Hubbard or Jaret Patterson would've brought later in the draft. Therefore, a true position of need could've been filled by an elite player. Instead, by drafting RB so early, another need position will suffer.

---