Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2

#67

I think the post combine results showing Kouandjio's disastrous results, including supposedly a very bad physical, may change the analysis somewhat.

 

Of course we can't know for certain how the Rams had him evaluated, but the pro combine speculation/consensus was that Kouandjio seemed to be a mid first round talent at T, and would have been a good fit for the Rams with their second first round pick at 13 if they decided to go elsewhere at 2.

 

Now, the talk is that the Alabama tackle will slide down to the 2nd or 3rd round, and that he looked so bad in drills, some are saying he can't play tackle at all and will have to move inside to G.  Conversely, Auburn's Greg Robinson and Texas A&M's Jake Matthews had great and good combines, respectively.  Robinson's stock will likely soar, and some speculation has him, not Matthews, as the top T by May's draft.

 

Do you think that changes the analysis over what the Rams will do at #2, since there may not be a viable mid first round LT alternative for them?

 

Worst to 1st.  Curse Reversed!





Reply


Messages In This Thread
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-13-2014, 07:58 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Predator - 02-13-2014, 08:48 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-13-2014, 09:00 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by rfc17 - 02-13-2014, 10:29 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by wiseman101 - 02-13-2014, 10:42 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-13-2014, 11:24 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Deacon - 02-13-2014, 11:26 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-13-2014, 11:27 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-13-2014, 11:30 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-13-2014, 11:34 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Vino - 02-13-2014, 11:36 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Deacon - 02-13-2014, 11:44 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-13-2014, 11:51 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by ukjag34 - 02-13-2014, 11:51 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Predator - 02-13-2014, 12:13 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-13-2014, 12:17 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Deacon - 02-13-2014, 12:17 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-13-2014, 12:25 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-13-2014, 12:56 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by HiggyJ15 - 02-13-2014, 01:30 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Raven09s - 02-13-2014, 01:31 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by TJBender - 02-13-2014, 03:43 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Jungle Cat - 02-14-2014, 06:28 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Kodiak - 02-14-2014, 08:18 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Jungle Cat - 02-15-2014, 02:01 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by ukjag34 - 02-15-2014, 01:10 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Scarecrow - 02-15-2014, 01:32 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-15-2014, 02:48 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-15-2014, 02:52 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-15-2014, 03:03 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-15-2014, 03:06 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-15-2014, 05:16 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by NYC4jags - 02-15-2014, 05:29 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by TJBender - 02-16-2014, 08:16 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bon Jagley - 02-16-2014, 10:31 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Scarecrow - 02-16-2014, 02:53 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Cleatwood - 02-16-2014, 02:59 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Cleatwood - 02-16-2014, 05:22 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Cleatwood - 02-16-2014, 05:32 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by jjud1017 - 02-16-2014, 05:56 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by TJBender - 02-17-2014, 12:46 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Jungle Cat - 02-18-2014, 01:15 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Jungle Cat - 02-18-2014, 01:47 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Cleatwood - 02-18-2014, 01:23 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-18-2014, 03:03 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by TJBender - 02-18-2014, 10:56 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-25-2014, 02:58 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-25-2014, 03:56 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by pirkster - 02-25-2014, 04:53 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-25-2014, 05:19 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-25-2014, 05:25 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by KFL - 02-25-2014, 05:49 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Deacon - 02-25-2014, 06:05 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-25-2014, 07:15 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Deacon - 02-26-2014, 10:09 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-26-2014, 10:47 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Deacon - 02-26-2014, 11:42 AM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Bullseye - 02-26-2014, 12:00 PM
Suppose the Rams don't go OT at 2 - by Deacon - 02-26-2014, 12:32 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!