(07-10-2021, 06:33 AM)The Real Marty Wrote:

(07-09-2021, 02:41 PM)jagibelieve Wrote: The thing is, do you think that this is appropriate?

From the article.

Exactly how "basic" of "function" needs to be shown or taught to children between the ages of 5 and 8 regarding those parts of the body?  What exactly defines the "critical parts" of the internal and external genitals of a child between the ages of 5 and 8?

The other part of the problem is that now many current public schools indoctrination centers are teaching children this young that it's "OK to be gay" or to "change what you have".

In my opinion it is disgusting to be exposing children that young to these ideas and pretty much amounts to child abuse.

I'm not defending the teacher or the teaching.  I'm defending the New York Times.  This thread started as an attack on the New York times, but all the NYTimes did was file a news report on this sex-education controversy.  

"New York Times Sinks to a New Low"... for reporting the story?  That's ridiculous.