The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Impressions From the Tacks Game
|
(10-11-2021, 03:00 AM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote:(10-10-2021, 05:10 PM)Bullseye Wrote: 1. I hereby advocate for the creation of a new stat: Referee Assisted TD (RAT). The need for such a stat was made obvious today, as the tacks first two TDs were complete fictions created by the officials. First, there is no conceivably honest, legitimate way that was a fumble. It's questionable whether it was even a completion. There is certainly no [BLEEP] way he could have been construed to have made a football move sufficient for a fumble to have been ruled on that play. Even Gene Steratore, the CBS replay guru, said as much. In light of the Myles Jack wasn't down play in the AFC Championship a few years back, it's even more infuriating. The Tacks' 2nd TD was made possible by a completely fabricated pass interference call against Claybrooks on a 3rd down stop. The only person who saw P.I. on the play was the official who threw the flag. The announcers didn't see it. I didn't see it. The fans in the stadium didn't see it. Even the tack WR didn't push for the flag. Considering the officials did NOT throw a P.I. flag in the end zone when the tack defender had clear contact with Arnold, I openly question their impartiality. Spare me the indignation over that line. I picked the tacks to win and they are the better team. But that was far from an honestly officiated game. The tacks are hard enough to beat without blatantly biased officiating. When you go into the market during the season to get a kicker, you want a guy who can 1) hit an extra point, and 2) hit a reasonably distant FG. It's really asking too much to also get a guy who can hit a FG from beyond 50 yards. There's a reason they're on the street without a job. Of course, in this case, it's a whiff. This guy can't even hit extra points reliably. (10-11-2021, 01:23 AM)JaguarKick Wrote: Frankly, it's become patently obvious that we're the new Browns. We're the team that will always find a way to mess it up, always shoot ourselves in the foot, always draft poorly, always be unable to retain our talent. We'll hire the wrong people and keep them for too long. Yes, it's amazing the fans keep showing up. It was a good crowd yesterday. |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.