(10-12-2021, 12:06 PM)MarleyJag Wrote:

(10-12-2021, 11:02 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: So which part of the grievances are contrived?

In the case of the incident in the bar, the moral outrage is contrived. That doesn't mean it didn't happen, it means UDS is causing it to be comically overblown. It was poor judgement on Urbs part no doubt. On the other hand, UDS has caused some people to equate the incident to sexual assault and him to a sexual predator which is utterly ridiculous.

I don't think it's contrived, the whole incident is embarrassingly unseemly. Not just the physical contact, but the entire circumstance of where and when it happened in relation to his responsibilities to this franchise and their disarray both on the field and off it. He behaved like a buffoon and then lied about it while trying to deflect the blame. Is she a gold digger? I dunno, but he shouldn't have been there for her to mine.

---

(10-12-2021, 12:54 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote:

(10-12-2021, 12:45 PM)rufftime Wrote: I love the absolutely unbiased term “Urban derangement syndrome”…. Yes anyone who feels like Urban is doing a bad job on the field and off the field is deranged.  Super helpful to facilitating discussion.  What a joke.

Did Urban commit a crime?  No, almost certainly not.  Is his relationship with this women morally concerning?  Yes for two reasons.  First, he is a married man.  Second, there appears to be a customer/ client relationship between them.  So it opens up harassment concerns from my standpoint.

Altogether is this incident in a vacuum a fireable offense?  No, probably not.  It does appear to be the cherry on top of a terrible job performance to this point.  Hopefully we are rid of this inept coach soon.

I think that’s a complete stretch too.

Her company works for his company, so it's not that far of a stretch. Of course if she's in sales she might've just been on the job.

---