(10-22-2021, 11:34 AM)HURRICANE!!! Wrote:

(10-22-2021, 11:27 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: Side note. I think it's crazy that liberals can be whomever they want to be while acting, and it's just accepted, then literally bash the real life version of everything they emulate as actors.

That's why they call it acting.  Do you actually think the actor portraying Ted Bundy or Jeffrey Dahmer should support raping and killing college girls or in Dahmer's case, eating male teens. 

act·ing
/ˈaktiNG/

adjective
temporarily doing the duties of another person.

(10-22-2021, 11:49 AM)Sneakers Wrote:

(10-22-2021, 11:04 AM)HURRICANE!!! Wrote: When I heard this last night, I thought Baldwin shot another actor as part of a movie scene.  In that case, I would have to state that the blame falls on the person that loaded the gun in which Balwin assumed they were loaded with blanks consistent with all the other movies in the past.  The fact that he shot the cinematographer places another twist on this since he never should have been aiming at that person and it was NOT part of the movie scene.    I'd have to say this is involuntary manslaughter (an act of gross negligence) so I kind of agree with StrowdCouwd1 on this.  Conversely, had he killed an actor in conjunction with the shooting (blanks) were part of the movie script, I'd have to say he should not be charged.

I was also surprised that it wasn't another actor and even more so to learn there were two victims.  Was more than one shot fired?  Very likely gross negligence was a factor, but a thorough investigation is an absolute must before charges are filed against anyone.