Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed

#45
(This post was last modified: 10-29-2021, 08:31 AM by Mikey.)

(10-28-2021, 04:17 PM)OzJohnnie Wrote: Heh.  So hard for these boards to admit that the unit on this team which blows the least is the oline.

TLaw is amazing.  Despite being utterly green and on an obvious steep learning curve, he alone is responsible for any success.  The oline performs?  No credi to them.  The game improves?  No credit to UM.  Pretty damned funny.  Pathetic as well, but still funny.

just as hard as it is for you to admit the same linemen and line coach were gettin QBs blowed up all season long a year ago.

It's a team sport. What has changed in a year? QB, OC, HC, and a few of the receivers. Not like Little is playing, so you can't even say fresh meat on the line is contributing to their newfound success. You can change the scheme all you want, but if the QB ain't getting the ball out, sacks are going to happen. They aren't, which leads me to believe that either we've hired the smartest OC ever (we didn't), or the QB is doing some brilliant work to avoid unnecessary sacks. 

Are you saying the line would look equally competent if Minshew or Glennon were still taking the snaps?

(10-28-2021, 05:55 PM)NH3 Wrote: While some of us wants to credit TL16 w/respect to this accomplishment, keep in mind of the injuries within the O-Line. Back Ups has stepped in w/little to No drop off.

The credit is shared to say the least.

NH3...

@You must pick a side and support your faction and your faction alone. Levelheadedness will not be tolerated.@

(enjoy your rec)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by SamusAranX - 10-28-2021, 03:03 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Jagwired - 10-28-2021, 03:11 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Hard_Eight - 10-28-2021, 03:32 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by SamusAranX - 10-28-2021, 03:54 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by nhiverson - 10-31-2021, 08:15 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by MoJagFan - 10-31-2021, 10:17 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Mikey - 11-01-2021, 10:01 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by OzJohnnie - 10-28-2021, 04:17 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by JaguarKick - 10-28-2021, 06:46 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by OzJohnnie - 10-28-2021, 08:10 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Mikey - 10-29-2021, 08:29 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by icey14 - 10-28-2021, 04:22 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by jaguarmvp - 10-28-2021, 05:02 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Jags32250 - 10-28-2021, 05:08 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by RicoTx - 10-28-2021, 05:39 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by NH3 - 10-28-2021, 05:55 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by navyjagfan - 10-28-2021, 08:10 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by jaguarmvp - 10-28-2021, 08:53 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by flsprtsgod - 10-28-2021, 08:56 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by OzJohnnie - 10-28-2021, 10:02 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by nejagsfan - 10-28-2021, 10:21 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by flsprtsgod - 10-28-2021, 10:27 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by nejagsfan - 10-28-2021, 10:38 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by flsprtsgod - 10-28-2021, 10:40 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by OzJohnnie - 10-29-2021, 02:19 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by flsprtsgod - 10-29-2021, 08:59 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by jaguarmvp - 10-28-2021, 11:00 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by flsprtsgod - 10-28-2021, 11:05 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by nejagsfan - 10-29-2021, 08:26 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by flsprtsgod - 10-29-2021, 09:06 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by JaguarKick - 10-28-2021, 08:57 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by nejagsfan - 10-28-2021, 09:14 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by flsprtsgod - 10-28-2021, 09:22 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by nejagsfan - 10-28-2021, 09:28 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by flsprtsgod - 10-28-2021, 09:34 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by nejagsfan - 10-28-2021, 09:53 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Mikey - 10-29-2021, 08:40 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Eric1 - 10-28-2021, 11:38 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Jag88 - 10-29-2021, 12:53 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by wg171 - 10-29-2021, 04:20 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Mikey - 10-29-2021, 08:52 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by nhiverson - 10-29-2021, 08:25 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Upper - 10-29-2021, 10:41 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by NYC4jags - 10-29-2021, 12:24 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by RicoTx - 10-29-2021, 12:30 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by NYC4jags - 10-29-2021, 12:36 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Kane - 10-29-2021, 12:50 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by TheDuke007 - 10-29-2021, 01:14 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Upper - 10-29-2021, 01:19 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by RicoTx - 10-29-2021, 02:23 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Kane - 10-29-2021, 06:57 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by MoJagFan - 10-29-2021, 08:02 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Kane - 10-30-2021, 09:55 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by NYC4jags - 10-30-2021, 04:23 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by NYC4jags - 10-29-2021, 08:39 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Mandeezee - 10-29-2021, 07:57 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Jag149 - 10-30-2021, 12:50 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by MoJagFan - 10-30-2021, 04:11 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Bullseye - 10-31-2021, 07:40 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by NYC4jags - 10-31-2021, 07:53 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Upper - 10-31-2021, 07:54 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by MoJagFan - 10-31-2021, 08:26 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by NYC4jags - 11-01-2021, 04:28 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Kane - 11-01-2021, 06:18 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by flsprtsgod - 11-01-2021, 05:06 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Eric1 - 11-02-2021, 01:31 AM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!