Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed

#53
(This post was last modified: 10-29-2021, 11:15 AM by ChrisJagBoy.)

Remember everyone on here laughing at me a few months back for saying if T Law was the real deal, our Oline would be perfectly fine as is.

(10-29-2021, 09:06 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote:
(10-29-2021, 08:26 AM)nejagsfan Wrote: no I'm pretty sure you said that they were terrible multiple times... they're no different from last year is what you said also... and they look the same on tape as they did last year.... I get it.. it's 100% the quarterback and the oline has nothing to do with it lmao

They aren't different from last year, the difference is the guy under center. They are a decent run blocking unit but the OC doesn't want to run the ball. They aren't good in pass pro though Trevor makes them look better than the QBs did last year. That sad thing is that they ran the ball pretty well last year when the QB play was awful, now it could be special with a competent guy back there but the OC just won't commit to it.

Considering Robinsons YPC is a full yard higher than Derrick Henry it makes you wonder why he dosen't get but half the carries Henry does.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by SamusAranX - 10-28-2021, 03:03 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Jagwired - 10-28-2021, 03:11 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Hard_Eight - 10-28-2021, 03:32 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by SamusAranX - 10-28-2021, 03:54 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by nhiverson - 10-31-2021, 08:15 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by MoJagFan - 10-31-2021, 10:17 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Mikey - 11-01-2021, 10:01 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by OzJohnnie - 10-28-2021, 04:17 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by JaguarKick - 10-28-2021, 06:46 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by OzJohnnie - 10-28-2021, 08:10 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Mikey - 10-29-2021, 08:29 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by icey14 - 10-28-2021, 04:22 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by jaguarmvp - 10-28-2021, 05:02 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Jags32250 - 10-28-2021, 05:08 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by RicoTx - 10-28-2021, 05:39 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by NH3 - 10-28-2021, 05:55 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by navyjagfan - 10-28-2021, 08:10 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by jaguarmvp - 10-28-2021, 08:53 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by flsprtsgod - 10-28-2021, 08:56 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by OzJohnnie - 10-28-2021, 10:02 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by nejagsfan - 10-28-2021, 10:21 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by flsprtsgod - 10-28-2021, 10:27 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by nejagsfan - 10-28-2021, 10:38 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by flsprtsgod - 10-28-2021, 10:40 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by OzJohnnie - 10-29-2021, 02:19 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by flsprtsgod - 10-29-2021, 08:59 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by jaguarmvp - 10-28-2021, 11:00 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by flsprtsgod - 10-28-2021, 11:05 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by nejagsfan - 10-29-2021, 08:26 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by flsprtsgod - 10-29-2021, 09:06 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by JaguarKick - 10-28-2021, 08:57 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by nejagsfan - 10-28-2021, 09:14 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by flsprtsgod - 10-28-2021, 09:22 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by nejagsfan - 10-28-2021, 09:28 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by flsprtsgod - 10-28-2021, 09:34 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by nejagsfan - 10-28-2021, 09:53 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Mikey - 10-29-2021, 08:40 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Eric1 - 10-28-2021, 11:38 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Jag88 - 10-29-2021, 12:53 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by wg171 - 10-29-2021, 04:20 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Mikey - 10-29-2021, 08:52 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by nhiverson - 10-29-2021, 08:25 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Upper - 10-29-2021, 10:41 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by ChrisJagBoy - 10-29-2021, 11:13 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by NYC4jags - 10-29-2021, 12:24 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by RicoTx - 10-29-2021, 12:30 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by NYC4jags - 10-29-2021, 12:36 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Kane - 10-29-2021, 12:50 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by TheDuke007 - 10-29-2021, 01:14 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Upper - 10-29-2021, 01:19 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by RicoTx - 10-29-2021, 02:23 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Kane - 10-29-2021, 06:57 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by MoJagFan - 10-29-2021, 08:02 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Kane - 10-30-2021, 09:55 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by NYC4jags - 10-30-2021, 04:23 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by NYC4jags - 10-29-2021, 08:39 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Mandeezee - 10-29-2021, 07:57 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Jag149 - 10-30-2021, 12:50 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by MoJagFan - 10-30-2021, 04:11 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Bullseye - 10-31-2021, 07:40 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by NYC4jags - 10-31-2021, 07:53 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Upper - 10-31-2021, 07:54 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by MoJagFan - 10-31-2021, 08:26 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by NYC4jags - 11-01-2021, 04:28 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Kane - 11-01-2021, 06:18 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by flsprtsgod - 11-01-2021, 05:06 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Eric1 - 11-02-2021, 01:31 AM



Users browsing this thread:

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!