Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed

#62

(10-29-2021, 02:02 PM)Senor Fantastico Wrote:
(10-29-2021, 01:19 PM)Upper Wrote: Not just Minshew though. Cam was getting Bortles destroyed too, and all of the QBs we've had since then. Foles, Kessler, Luton, Glennon. Yeah it's fair that they are all probably below average at pocket awareness, but I think the combined evidence would show that Lawrence is FAR better at raising the oline's perception than all of those QBs were at lowering them

All of these different people who do oline charting all say without exception that our oline has been losing their individual battles for as long as those services have existed. It's not just our eyes and it's not just PFF.

https://twitter.com/Brickwallblitz/statu...FJ9-A&s=19


Dead average.

So... Not bad?
I'm sure the usual suspects will sweep it under the rug.

Always wanted to blame the OL when Bortles and Minshew were bad at their jobs.
I remember specifically Glennon filling in and seeing much less pressure and sacks. The OL was the same but the veteran knew how to at least get rid of the ball and sense pressure. Foles in his limited snaps I think fared better too.

TLaw early on held the ball too long and was getting hammered and throwing a lot of INTs. As he improved so did the OL. Weird.

Don't think anyone is saying we have an all-star ol either. Just offering perspective and context. Which a lot of our posters probably don't even understand the concept or definition of the words.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by SamusAranX - 10-28-2021, 03:03 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Jagwired - 10-28-2021, 03:11 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Hard_Eight - 10-28-2021, 03:32 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by SamusAranX - 10-28-2021, 03:54 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by nhiverson - 10-31-2021, 08:15 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by MoJagFan - 10-31-2021, 10:17 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Mikey - 11-01-2021, 10:01 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by OzJohnnie - 10-28-2021, 04:17 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by JaguarKick - 10-28-2021, 06:46 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by OzJohnnie - 10-28-2021, 08:10 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Mikey - 10-29-2021, 08:29 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by icey14 - 10-28-2021, 04:22 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by jaguarmvp - 10-28-2021, 05:02 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Jags32250 - 10-28-2021, 05:08 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by RicoTx - 10-28-2021, 05:39 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by NH3 - 10-28-2021, 05:55 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by navyjagfan - 10-28-2021, 08:10 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by jaguarmvp - 10-28-2021, 08:53 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by flsprtsgod - 10-28-2021, 08:56 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by OzJohnnie - 10-28-2021, 10:02 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by nejagsfan - 10-28-2021, 10:21 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by flsprtsgod - 10-28-2021, 10:27 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by nejagsfan - 10-28-2021, 10:38 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by flsprtsgod - 10-28-2021, 10:40 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by OzJohnnie - 10-29-2021, 02:19 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by flsprtsgod - 10-29-2021, 08:59 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by jaguarmvp - 10-28-2021, 11:00 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by flsprtsgod - 10-28-2021, 11:05 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by nejagsfan - 10-29-2021, 08:26 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by flsprtsgod - 10-29-2021, 09:06 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by JaguarKick - 10-28-2021, 08:57 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by nejagsfan - 10-28-2021, 09:14 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by flsprtsgod - 10-28-2021, 09:22 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by nejagsfan - 10-28-2021, 09:28 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by flsprtsgod - 10-28-2021, 09:34 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by nejagsfan - 10-28-2021, 09:53 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Mikey - 10-29-2021, 08:40 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Eric1 - 10-28-2021, 11:38 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Jag88 - 10-29-2021, 12:53 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by wg171 - 10-29-2021, 04:20 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Mikey - 10-29-2021, 08:52 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by nhiverson - 10-29-2021, 08:25 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Upper - 10-29-2021, 10:41 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by NYC4jags - 10-29-2021, 12:24 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by RicoTx - 10-29-2021, 12:30 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by NYC4jags - 10-29-2021, 12:36 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Kane - 10-29-2021, 12:50 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by TheDuke007 - 10-29-2021, 01:14 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Upper - 10-29-2021, 01:19 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by RicoTx - 10-29-2021, 02:23 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Kane - 10-29-2021, 06:57 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by MoJagFan - 10-29-2021, 08:02 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Kane - 10-30-2021, 09:55 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by NYC4jags - 10-30-2021, 04:23 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by NYC4jags - 10-29-2021, 08:39 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Mandeezee - 10-29-2021, 07:57 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Jag149 - 10-30-2021, 12:50 AM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by MoJagFan - 10-30-2021, 04:11 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Bullseye - 10-31-2021, 07:40 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by NYC4jags - 10-31-2021, 07:53 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Upper - 10-31-2021, 07:54 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by MoJagFan - 10-31-2021, 08:26 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by NYC4jags - 11-01-2021, 04:28 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Kane - 11-01-2021, 06:18 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by flsprtsgod - 11-01-2021, 05:06 PM
RE: Tied for Fewest Sacks Allowed - by Eric1 - 11-02-2021, 01:31 AM



Users browsing this thread:

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!