(11-09-2021, 11:28 AM)flgatorsandjags Wrote:

(11-09-2021, 09:36 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: Can you explain why Rhule is a bad coach? Dude has 4 wins with Sam Darnold in the NFC South which is a really tough division.

What has he done in his coaching career to even think he would be a good NFL coach?  He was the Giants offensive line coach 1 year, the head coach for Temple, and the head coach for Baylor lol.  Not the coaching resume that I would look for in my NFL head coach lol. What part of his resume made you think he would be a good head coach at the next level?

---

(11-08-2021, 05:52 PM)scottyg Wrote: Kingsbury was supposed to suck too.  Frankly, he didn't even come off as a particularly strong college coach, but Arizona let him pick his own shiny, new quarterback, and he's not looking too bad as a result.

I wonder how much Rhule had to say about trading for Darnold...  If that was his choice, then he's made his own bed.  If not, then I feel for him just a tiny little bit - dudes at that level get paid too well for me to really feel sorry for them.

Oklahoma vs Baylor.  A big difference there, but yes that was a risk

---

(11-09-2021, 09:04 AM)Mikey Wrote: well this certainly is a take.

I would easily take Rhule and Brady over Urbz and Bevell.

I'd rather Urban and Brady.  So you thank Rhule is a good coach?

I do; as to Rhule's resume, he took over Baylor after the program cratered following a major sexual assault scandal. He replaced a placeholder coach (Jim Grobe) and got the team from 1-11 in his first year to the Sugar Bowl in two seasons. He was the textbook definition of an ascending head coach. I absolutely wanted us to hire him instead of keeping Marrone for his final season. Rhule proved he could do more with less and showed creativity in scheme that was making him a coveted hire at both CFB and pro levels.

Oklahoma? Kingsbury was Texas Tech. Kyler played at Oklahoma. Understandable to cross the two up.

---