(12-31-2021, 04:20 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: I've posted that months ago. TLDR version, Zuckerberg set up a charity that funded to red counties and blue counties that looked to be equitable, but actually spent upwards 4 to 1 in favor of democratic strongholds in MI, PA, GA, and WI. This included training for ballot inspections. Thrown out ballots went from 3% to .3% That was one of my primary complaints about the election last year.

Here's the Time article.

https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/

You will be duped because they say this bi-partisan group just wanted to protect the election (and, for whatever reason, you believe anything in print), but there were never any accusations of fraud against the Trump campaign. The truth is this group did what it could to get Trump out. I have no doubts Zuckerberg played a role, as did several Republicans who looked the other way to ensure Trump was ousted.

Only a fool believes that election was 100% on the up and up. A lot of the dominion stuff is probably overblown, but facts are facts. You don't have those change of numbers without something nefarious going on. I think there were 4 elements: Ballot harvesting in democratic strongholds, new standards implemented to ensure all ballots were counted regardless of whether they qualified or not (part of the Zuckerberg initiative), and establishment officials turning a blind eye to the obvious voter disparity from years past. I don't believe it's a coincidence that GA officials didn't care about election reform until they got smacked in the face with Democrats winning the runoff.

The Time article describes private efforts to increase voter turnout, especially mail in voter turnout, especially in demographics and areas that would help Democrats. There is nothing wrong with that. Republicans should do it too if they want to win.

The bolded part, that's a serious claim. It implies some possible illegal or unfair activity.  I don't find anything backing that up, though.

---