(01-05-2022, 01:48 PM)Caldrac Wrote:

(01-05-2022, 01:13 PM)snowwolf776 Wrote: Wayne weaver wasn't much better the Khan afteall. his overall record was 138  134 loses


heres a link      https://www.pro-football-reference.com/e...eavWa0.htm


My dad told me this morning the whole clown vault is a bad idea,and khan will end up keeping  Trent  despite the fans. Dad says your not supporting team with the clown out. 

I disagree with him on it.  We want the team to be better.  Dad was right about them loseing under Wayne weaver though. lst serveal seasons he was there jags had loseing record too most of the time.

---

Wayne was here 17 years only had 7 winning seasons. Kan has been here 10 now,and has 2 winning years right?

What are you rambling on about now?

Jacksonville had one of the most successful franchises to ever start in any sport on the professional level. The 1995 season was rough, but, after that? They went on a four year stretch of all kinds of stunning upsets, thrills, record level beat downs against two legends of the game on an interstate team, etc. 

Weaver only made one critical mistake as an owner. That mistake was firing Coughlin instead of finding a more suitable director of personnel or general manager to help him build a roster. He went a little overboard after that 1999 loss and I think after making it close twice in just four years he was hungry for the ultimate victory and he put us in cap hell.

Of course, we all know how the rest of this story unfolds. He goes to New York. Wins two titles against the greatest coach and quarterback of all time in both contests and he got the last laugh. All that said. 

Weaver didn't strike out too bad with Jack Del Rio and James Harris. For what it's worth. When you go back and you really look at the moves they made, the rosters they tried to build. They at least tried and they at least compiled a much more competent product than we have ever seen in comparison to anything Khan has done in his 10 years of ownership. 

138 - 134 is still better than average. Khan is 41 - 118. He's the 2nd fastest owner of all time to reach triple digit losses. Quick math! Who do you like better in this scenario?