(01-21-2022, 10:11 AM)mikesez Wrote:

(01-21-2022, 07:15 AM)copycat Wrote: As always you redefine the discussion to fit your view.  Clearly this conversation is about “street people” and you moved the goal post to include sheltered homeless.  They are not the same and you are aware of that.

I didn't write the article.  I agree the article is broader than the discussion here, but still has facts that are pertinent to us.  Do you have a better article to link us to?

---

(01-21-2022, 08:56 AM)Sneakers Wrote: This post illustrates the problem with you and your fellow "lefties", you're too gullible. You seize any and all information that supports your agenda without consideration for timing and/or situational relevancy, then pride yourselves of being 'informed".  The article credits specific studies a total of ten times, the most recent of which dates back to 2014.  

5 from 2014
2 from 2013
2 from 2010
1 from.............................wait for it........................1996.

Same question to you.  Do you ha e a better article?

I honestly don't know if you're being deliberately obtuse, or you simply lack the mental agility to follow the conversation.  You believe everything you read on the internet like a well-trained socialist.  You then quite magnanimously scholar the less informed masses with your "expert" knowledge.    A true puppet, dancing on the strings of the Left.

The most current data source is 7 years old.  Finding more relevant statistics shouldn't be an overly challenging task.  Here's a useful tip to help you.  Any research article that doesn't first and foremost define the topic of study is useless.

---