Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
The Case For Evan Neal at 1

#1

This is the time of year where draftniks start to formulate their opinions on the ddraft overall and what their particular teams should do in the draft.  There are three guys generally speculated to be the #1 overall pick.  Of those three, it seems Evan Neal is not the most popular choice among many draftniks who are Jaguars fans.  However, contrary to popular belief, Evan Neal ‘s athletic attributes, positional value, versatility, and team need makes him the best choice for the Jaguars if the team is forced to stay at #1.

There is certainly an argument to be made that Neal is the BAP at that spot in the draft.  Based upon the mocks by the national draft experts, Neal is almost universally viewed as a top 3 player.  With his massive size at 6-7. 350 lbs and his considerable athletic ability, it makes him an imposing specimen.   He was a 5 star recruit out of high school, so he has been identified as a pro prospect for years.  He was a 3 year starter At Alabama, playing against top notch pass rushers, giving up only one sack this year.  He received pro level coaching from Doug marrone.  Say what you will about Marrone as a head coach, he is known for getting production out of the OL.  In large part due to Marrone's coaching, one of Neal's strengths is his technique.  Technique is a huge part of what makes for the best tackles.  Anthony Munoz had great technique, as did Boselli. Neal's technique will help his transition into the NFL.   This combination of warrant consideration for him at the top spot.

From a need basis, there is plenty to like about Beal being the #1 overall pick.  As of this writing, the Jaguars have three (3) starters from last year who are free agents:  Cam robinson, Andrew Norwell, and AJ Cann.  Furthermore, RT represents a huge hole, as Taylor has been awful.  His propensity to give up sacks and commit penalties kept the Jaguars and TL in far too many awful down and distance situations which bogged down drives.   Some will argue T is less of a need than people think because Cam Robinson only gave up one sack and Walker Little showed promise at LT at the end of the year.  However, Robinson has been viewed by most as a liability at LT, and most thought it was a mistake tp slap a franchise tag on him last year.Walker Littls started all of three gmes after being sidelined since 2019 in college due to a knee injury and Covid.  He is far from a proven commodity.  Most people argued OL was definitely the area of biggest need last year.  Walker Little’s 3 games as a starter, does not equal the team has upgraded OL.  Drafting Neal would increase comnpetition on the OL and be a bit of a safeguard against possible failure by Little.  Furthermore, dating back to 2015, of the team’s NINE (9) first round picks in that span, SIX (6) f them have been spent on the defense.  Of the three offensive players referenced, two of those picks were RBs-Fournette (no longer on the team) and Etienne (missed his entire rookie season with a Lisfranc injury).  The 3rd was Trevor Lawrence.  Besides the pending free agents along the OL, there is huge need at the skill positions.  Chark, the only one of the receivers who can get any kind of vertical separation, is a free agent.  Meanwhile, the defense not only had the benefit of all of those high picks, the bulk of the free agency money went to the defense last year.  Trevor Lawrence needs help,  refusing to prioritize getting him surrounding help especially when the draft value is there is gross negligence.
 
Furthermore, Neal’s versatility would have a tremendous positive impact on OL depth.  Injuries to the OL can be one of the biggest obstacles to team success.  If you recall, one of the main reasons the 2018 Jaguars fell off so dramatically from the 2017 performance was the injuries to the offensive line, starting with the loss of LT Cam Robinson. Conversely,it’s proven that sufficient quality depth along the OL can prove to mitigate the negative effects of injuries, even if it wouldn’t completely prevent the injuries from happening.  Jaguars fans who were around the first five years can remember one of the big advantages we enjoyed was having a guy in Ben Coleman who could step in and play LT at a reasonably high level when Boselli went out with injury.  Indeed, at various points, Coleman had success against guys like Derr8ick Thomas, Neil Smith and Jevon Kearse enabled the Jaguars to win games against quality opponents because they were able to provide adequate protection for Brunell in Boselli’s absence.  To cite a more contemporary example, the 2017-2018 Philadelphia Eagles, coached by Doug Pederson,, won the Super Bowl despite being down to their 3rd string LT.   With Neal’s proven versatility (having played 3 positions along the OL in college), the Jaguars could begin to replicate the deoth dynamics cited above.  If you drafted Neal, minimally, you’d have two guys who could put in quality snaps in at LT with he and Little-replicating the dynamic with Boselli and Coleman.  If you kept Robinson, Taylor, Little and still drafted Neal, the team would be in a position where no fewer then three players could presumably give you quality snaps at LT (Neal, Robinson and Little) and three guys who could play RT in a pinch (Neal, Little, and Taylor), which would enable the Jaguars to keep performing at a reasonably high level like that Eagles’ team Pederson coached to a title.   Neither Hutchinson nor Thibideaux can provide that sort of versatility.

Some would argue that taking Neal would be a mistake, especially if he couldn’t immediately play LT, or that selecting Neal would serve to waste Walker Little’s development at LT.  I submit neither proposition would  be the case.  First off, Jon Ogden played G his first year and he was the 4th overall pick in 1996.  Nobody contends Ogden was not worth the selection that year because he started out as a G, and there isn’t too much difference between the #1 overall pick and the $4 overall pick, especially in a draft class without a top tier QB.  Furthermore, I submit that sometimes, the standard of drafting shouldn’t necessarily be BAP, but instead BAP for the team.  The 2013 draft wasn’t a particularly strong draft, especially at the very top.  But two teams in Peserson’s career benefitted greatly from it in Kansas City and Philadelphia.  KC picked LT Eric Fisher #1 overall.  While Fisher was no Boselli, he was the best player  that draft for the Chiefs.  He wound up solidifying LT for the Chiefs for years, and manned that most important spot for the Chiefs when they won the Super Bowl about three years ago, and his absence was critical to the Super Bowl loss the following year to Tampa.  In Philly, the Eagles drafted Lane Johnson out of Oklahoma.  While some thought he had the capability of playing LT, he has played exclusively RT for the Eagles, and was a critical part of the OL that helped the Eagles win the Super Bowl under Pederson.  You don’t necessarily have to be all world to be the # 1 pick in the draft, just the best player for the team that’s picking in that spot.  As for Little, I would envision Little and Neal competing for OL position if Neal were drafted.  I submit the competition would make both players better no matter which side of the line they played.


I believe Neal would provide a tremendous upgrade to the OL no matter whic side of the OL he played on and would provide a lot of support to Trevor Lawrence.  He would fit a need and improve depth tremendously with his versatility  He certainly warrants consideration at #1.
 

Worst to 1st.  Curse Reversed!





Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Messages In This Thread
The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Bullseye - 02-19-2022, 11:59 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Bullseye - 02-20-2022, 01:43 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Bullseye - 02-20-2022, 09:52 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Bullseye - 02-20-2022, 11:00 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by I am Yoda - 02-20-2022, 08:53 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by ATLjag - 02-20-2022, 10:44 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Bullseye - 02-20-2022, 11:22 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Upper - 02-20-2022, 11:36 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Bullseye - 02-20-2022, 12:16 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Upper - 02-20-2022, 11:48 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Upper - 02-20-2022, 02:46 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Bullseye - 02-20-2022, 05:25 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Bullseye - 02-20-2022, 10:04 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Bullseye - 02-20-2022, 04:51 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Jag149 - 02-20-2022, 03:09 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Upper - 02-20-2022, 03:09 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Upper - 02-20-2022, 03:41 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by I am Yoda - 02-21-2022, 08:07 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by jaglou53 - 02-21-2022, 10:48 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Cleatwood - 02-21-2022, 09:32 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Bullseye - 02-21-2022, 10:40 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Bullseye - 02-21-2022, 10:59 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Dimson - 02-21-2022, 11:07 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by TheDuke007 - 02-22-2022, 10:57 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Bullseye - 02-23-2022, 08:38 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by TheDuke007 - 02-27-2022, 12:42 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Jag149 - 02-28-2022, 08:52 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Bullseye - 02-23-2022, 08:31 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by TheDuke007 - 02-26-2022, 11:44 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Upper - 02-23-2022, 11:50 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Bullseye - 02-23-2022, 10:09 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by StrayaJag - 02-24-2022, 12:57 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Bullseye - 02-24-2022, 06:38 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by RicoTx - 02-24-2022, 10:09 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by DTWD4∞ - 02-24-2022, 11:27 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Mikey - 02-28-2022, 11:06 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Upper - 02-24-2022, 08:23 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by TheDuke007 - 02-27-2022, 12:58 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Jag149 - 02-25-2022, 01:15 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Jag149 - 02-25-2022, 02:14 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Upper - 02-25-2022, 12:02 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by DTWD4∞ - 02-25-2022, 12:57 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Upper - 02-25-2022, 01:49 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Upper - 02-26-2022, 12:05 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Upper - 02-26-2022, 02:20 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Caldrac - 02-26-2022, 03:46 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Mikey - 02-28-2022, 11:15 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Upper - 02-27-2022, 02:24 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by StrayaJag - 02-27-2022, 06:07 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by StrayaJag - 02-27-2022, 08:48 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Upper - 02-27-2022, 09:22 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Dimson - 02-28-2022, 01:20 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Cleatwood - 02-28-2022, 11:55 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Dimson - 02-28-2022, 12:00 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by DTWD4∞ - 02-28-2022, 12:25 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Dimson - 02-28-2022, 12:33 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Cleatwood - 02-28-2022, 12:34 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Dimson - 02-28-2022, 12:41 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by DTWD4∞ - 03-01-2022, 12:14 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Mikey - 03-01-2022, 10:02 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by burt1jason - 02-28-2022, 11:58 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Mikey - 03-01-2022, 09:54 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Mikey - 03-02-2022, 11:01 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Bullseye - 03-02-2022, 08:15 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Bullseye - 03-03-2022, 10:29 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Bullseye - 03-03-2022, 04:35 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Cleatwood - 03-01-2022, 06:54 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Cleatwood - 03-01-2022, 07:55 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Cleatwood - 03-03-2022, 09:52 AM
The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Caldrac - 03-01-2022, 07:36 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Cleatwood - 03-02-2022, 11:22 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Cleatwood - 03-02-2022, 06:42 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Cleatwood - 03-02-2022, 07:08 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Cleatwood - 03-02-2022, 07:28 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Mikey - 03-03-2022, 09:23 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by RicoTx - 03-03-2022, 09:24 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Cleatwood - 03-03-2022, 10:06 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Bullseye - 03-03-2022, 10:39 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Cleatwood - 03-03-2022, 11:55 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Cleatwood - 03-03-2022, 12:06 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Bullseye - 03-03-2022, 02:36 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Dimson - 03-03-2022, 05:29 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Upper - 03-01-2022, 08:38 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by NoShoes - 03-03-2022, 11:24 AM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Dimson - 03-04-2022, 04:33 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Eric1 - 03-04-2022, 08:41 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Dimson - 03-04-2022, 09:29 PM
RE: The Case For Evan Neal at 1 - by Upper - 03-28-2022, 07:05 PM



Users browsing this thread:

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!